The impact of the difference in the authenticity of the concept of violation on the difference in jurisprudence provisions

This study has talked about an important issue of the science of jurisprudence, which was built upon the provisions of many branches and jurisprudential parts, by following the inductive approaches, and comparative analytical and this study tagged entitled: (The impact of the difference in the authenticity of the concept of violation on the difference in jurisprudence provisions) where God Almighty stated the legal provisions of the operative, and the proof of the opposite of the operative judgment (violator) is evidence of considering the restriction in the operative provision, where it dealt with the definition of the terms of the study and the statement of the authenticity of the concept of violation among scholars, and highlighting some applications The branches of jurisprudence are: the obligation of zakat on the sheep that are known, the permissibility of marrying girls in writing, the fruit that is included in the sale if the palm tree is sold or not, and the obligation to support the divorced woman and other branches of jurisprudence.